It’s also disturbing that the images of some walk-on players are used by the NCAA to generate revenues, but these players are never compensated.
SHOULD COLLEGE ATHLETES BE PAID HOW TO
They will concentrate on their studies and sports activities without having to worry about how to make ends meet. When college athletes get paid, they’ll not need to look for employment elsewhere to take care of their daily needs. A student who attempts to do this will end up leading a stressful life, which is not good for his or her health. Paying College Athletes Would Make Them HealthierĪnother reason why college athletes should be paid is that a student can not manage to study, participate in sports activities, and also work part-time. Doesn’t this justify some payment for college athletes? Of course, it does. This denies the students an opportunity to work as their colleagues.Įven though they sometimes get tuition waivers and some stipends to cover standard college expenses, they never get any cash to pay for incidentals such as clothes, recreation, and food. The time the students spend in the field is more than the time many people spend on part-time jobs. Many students report that, on average, they spend about 28 hours in the field every week.
The NCAA requires that the time students take in the field should be limited to only 20 hours per week, but this isn’t the case. This is because most of the time, they will be in the field practising. Students who take part in athletics do not have time for side hustles. Athletics Can Be a Source Of Income For The Students Let’s explore some reasons why college athletes need to get paid.
SHOULD COLLEGE ATHLETES BE PAID FREE
Though some might argue that some college athletes get scholarships to play, while others get free education, it is obvious that what these athletes bring to the universities is far much more than what the universities give them in return. This happens, even though these players break their backs year in year out, but can’t enjoy the fruits of their hard work. However, it’s sad that the players aren’t paid for their sweat. No wonder, many universities lay so much emphasis on sporting activities. Alabama, Clemson, Ohio State, and Georgia have repeatedly made it to the playoffs, and the national championship has been Clemson or Alabama for the past four years.Do you know that college sports bring in between $30 million to $40 million to the universities every year? This isn’t a small figure. We’ve had almost the same college football playoff teams since it started. The next counter-argument is that the same teams would win. When 2023 comes, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, and other states may try to pass bills. This is untrue because the South and the SEC exist. Opponents of the act have also said that if California paid its players then California schools would get all the recruits. College football isn’t changing the only thing that’s changing is the players’ ability to profit off their names. Why not start paying them now? People will still be die-hard fans and the atmosphere will stay the same. The top players leave anyway and get brand deals after their first few years. Only the players who are good enough to have name recognition would get these deals players who aren’t good enough would stay in college all four years. Making a little money on the side while spending a year or two in college will not ruin the reputation of college sports. For most of the top collegiate athletes, getting an education is not on their mind, so a scholarship really isn’t compensation. If a player is good enough, they will use college athletics as a stepping stone to the pros, which already happens. The NCAA made $1 billion in revenue in 2017, and not providing a stipend to the very players who are making them money doesn’t make sense.Ī lot of people on social media are saying the act would ruin college athletics. The Duke men’s basketball team made $34 million. Zion Williamson attracted a crowd wherever he played, yet he got nothing in compensation during his time at Duke. There are multiple players in recent years who should’ve made money while they were in college. Top tier recruits go to college and make millions of dollars for their schools yet they are unable to sign deals or make money for themselves. The initiative will go into effect in California in 2023. The Fair Pay to Play Act is a first-of-its-kind initiative that will allow college athletes to make money off their name and likeness. A college athlete’s life is consumed by their sport, and if they are making money for their school, or for the NCAA, then it is absurd to say they shouldn’t be paid. College athletes should get paid for their efforts and the benefits they bring to their schools.
0 kommentar(er)
